\n
Iversen used the women\u2019s bathroom after finding the men\u2019s bathroom closed. Iversen then said they were approached by casino security, who asked to see their identification. Iversen was told, \u201caccording to your identification, you are not female,\u201d and was accused of using the \u201cwrong washroom.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\nIversen reported in tribunal filings that they felt \u201cridiculed\u201d and \u201cbelittled.\u201d That\u2019s after the casino manager informed them that \u201canyone who is transgendered must report to the customer service desk at the entrance to \u2018check in\u2019 to use the \u2018other\u2019 washroom.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nThe casino then asked them to leave, according to Iverson. <\/span><\/p>\nDivergent Accounts <\/span><\/b><\/h2>\nGateway\u2019s version of events differed wildly, the tribunal noted. <\/span>The company, which operates <\/span>23 casinos in British Columbia, Alberta, and Ontario<\/span>, denies Iversen to leave.<\/p>\nGateway claimed it asked Iversen to move the conversation to the casino lobby after Iversen became \u201cangry and agitated\u201d when security queried their use of the women\u2019s washroom. Staff also informed them that <\/span>a single, non-gendered washroom was available<\/span>.<\/p>\nBut Iversen threatened to sue the casino and inform the media, claiming Iversen knew high-ranking government officials and would \u201cget rich\u201d from the situation, according to Gateway\u2019s account. <\/span><\/strong><\/p>\nFar from being thrown out, Iversen remained writing notes and taking selfies for up to 15 minutes before finally leaving of their own accord, the operator claimed.<\/span><\/p>\nIversen sent a letter of complaint to the casino 11 months later. The casino manager replied and apologized, adding that discriminatory behavior was not condoned at the establishment. The two parties then entered mediation, which failed.<\/span><\/p>\n$7K Settlement Rejected<\/span><\/b><\/h2>\nWhen Iversen escalated the case to the human rights tribunal, the casino offered <\/span>a $7,000 settlement, promised to update its policy and training and issued Iversen a letter of apology. <\/span><\/p>\nIversen rejected this, declaring the case to be \u201cgroundbreaking.\u201d They said unless it was heard by the tribunal, other businesses would be able to do the same. <\/span><\/p>\nThe tribunal disagreed, determining that the case involved a “single, relatively brief incident,” which was without \u201cidentity-related insults, violence, or harassment.\u201d<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\u201cThe non-monetary remedies demonstrate that Gateway took the complainant’s allegations seriously and reflect an intention to avoid future events,\u201d the tribunal panel wrote. <\/span><\/p>\nThe $7,000, which the panel described as \u201creasonable,\u201d remains on the table. <\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"A Canadian gambler who identifies as non-binary took on a casino operator at a human rights tribunal.\u00a0 The dispute was over bathrooms, and the plaintiff lost. That\u2019s according to Castanet, a British Columbia news portal. Christopher Iversen was playing slots at 5:30 a.m. at an unnamed Gateway Casinos property when nature called, according to filings […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":36,"featured_media":258096,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[81887,62,60],"tags":[13597,84901,84900],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
Non-Binary Gambler Loses Human Rights Case on Restroom Use<\/title>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\n