Phil Worthingon, pictured above, with his betting slip. According to the UK Gambling Commission, a betting slip is a \u201clegally enforceable contract.\u201d (Image: Chronicle Live)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nRetired electrician Phil Worthington, 72, told The Manchester Evening News<\/em> he placed \u00a325 on Manchester City, Liverpool, and Chelsea to finish in the top three, and Norwich, Burnley, and Watford to be relegated from the EPL last season.<\/p>\nWorthington was elated when the 40\/1 bet came in, expecting a \u00a31,000 (US$1,190) payout. But when he went to collect, Coral said the bet had been allowed \u201cby mistake.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\nThe bet had been recommended by a tipster in the national tabloid newspaper The Sun<\/em>. Worthington said he showed the newspaper to the manager of the betting shop when he placed the bet.<\/p>\nThe manager left Worthington waiting for 20 minutes while he consulted with his superiors before returning to say that, yes, Coral would accept the bet, according to the gambler.<\/p>\n
Incomplete Information<\/strong><\/h2>\nBut the official line from Coral now is that the copy printed in The Sun<\/em> was \u201cincomplete and inaccurate\u201d because of a \u201cmistake made when transmitting the information\u201d to the newspaper. The company had never offered this specific \u201cspecial wager,\u201d it added.<\/p>\n“The 40\/1 special price we were offering at that time was for Man City, Liverpool, Chelsea, and Arsenal to finish 1-2-3-4 in that order, and for Burnley, Watford, and Norwich to finish 18-19-20 in that order,\u201d said Coral in a statement.<\/p>\n
The Sun copy didn\u2019t specify the fact that it was to finish in the correct order. But even more importantly, left off Arsenal for the top four correct finishing order, rendering it a significantly more likely outcome at that stage, and therefore a significantly shorter price to occur,” Coral continued.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Arsenal ultimately failed to finish fourth, losing out on a coveted Champions League spot to bitter North London rival Tottenham.<\/p>\n
Coral said it recalculated the odds of Worthington\u2019s actual bet and offered 2\/1, for a \u00a350 payout.<\/p>\n
The Sun<\/em> said: “Coral gave us the odds by email direct and without specifying the order. Furthermore, they took the bet as it stood, and so it is their legal issue and not ours.”<\/p>\nBetting Slip \u2018Enforceable Contract\u2019<\/strong><\/h2>\nWorthington told The Manchester Evening News<\/em> he intends to pursue the matter through a small claims court \u201cas a matter of principle.\u201d<\/p>\nHere\u2019s what the UK Gambling Commission rules have to say on the enforceability of betting slips.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen you place a bet with a licensed gambling business, you enter into a legally enforceable contract with that business. Gambling businesses must make the terms and conditions of the bet available to you.<\/p>\n
\u201cBefore deciding whether or not to place a bet, make sure you’re familiar with the terms and conditions and that you understand what they mean, especially in the event of any changed circumstances around the bet.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
UK bookmaker Coral is refusing to pay out on a 40\/1 English Premier League (EPL) parlay bet. That’s because it says the wager was a \u201cmistake\u201d that should not have been offered in the first place. Retired electrician Phil Worthington, 72, told The Manchester Evening News he placed \u00a325 on Manchester City, Liverpool, and Chelsea […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":36,"featured_media":220608,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[60,16,1074],"tags":[],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
Coral Won\u2019t Pay \u00a31K EPL Bet After Sun Tipster Prints \u2018Wrong\u2019 Info<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n