\n
In Kansas, tribes don’t share a dime with the state. Instead, they only cover expenses incurred by the state in governing the tribal casinos. The same is true in Colorado and Wyoming, where compacts don’t mandate a revenue-sharing provision.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
In New Mexico, tribal casinos share between 8.75 percent and 9.5 percent, depending on their gross gaming revenue (GGR). Arizona taxes Native American gaming win at a rate of 3.5-8 percent, and South Dakota nine percent. Michigan tribes share eight to 10 percent.<\/p>\n
On the other end of the spectrum, in Connecticut, the state’s Mashantucket Pequot and Mohegan Indians direct 25 percent of their slot revenue to the government. Several New York tribes share 25 percent, too. In Florida, the Seminole Tribe has given the state $350 million annually. But that recently stopped as the tribe and state tries to settle a several years-long dispute.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Oklahoma’s tribal casinos aren’t sharing enough of their gaming win with the state. So says a newly formed opposition group that has gone on the offensive with an advertising campaign blitz. Gov. Kevin Stitt (R) is under the impression the Class III gaming compacts that allow more than 30 federally recognized tribes to operate slot […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":25,"featured_media":126306,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[61,18456],"tags":[],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
Oklahoma Tribal Casino Opposition Deploys Ad Campaign<\/title>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\n