Reckless or Negligent<\/strong><\/h2>\n“Unlike other companies in Illinois, defendants failed to take notice and follow the requirements of the Biometric Information Privacy Act, even though the law was enacted in 2008 and numerous articles and court filings were published about the law’s requirement before defendants committed the violations alleged in this complaint,” the lawsuits argue.<\/p>\n
“As a result, defendants’ violations of the Biometric Information Privacy Act were reckless, or in the alternative, negligent,” they contend.<\/p>\n
The case has been brought by several plaintiffs who gambled regularly at the casinos and are members of their respective rewards programs. They note the case likely involves thousands of others, making a class-action suit the only appropriate option.<\/p>\n
They are asking for liquidated or actual monetary damages — whichever is higher — \u201cfor each violation of the Biometric Information Privacy Act.”<\/p>\n
Last year, Harrah’s casino alone admitted 1.29 million customers, with an average daily admission of 3,536.<\/p>\n
The casinos have yet to file responses to the lawsuits.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Two class-action lawsuits have been filed by casino-goers over two Joliet, Illinois casinos\u2019 use of facial recognition technology. Patch.com reports that the two almost identical lawsuits accuse Caesars\u2019 Harrah\u2019s Casino and Penn National\u2019s Hollywood Casino of breaching the state\u2019s Biometric Information Privacy Act by using facial geometry scans to create and gather customer information without […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":36,"featured_media":117841,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[60,18],"tags":[],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
Harrahs Casino, Hollywood Casino Sued Over Facial Recognition Tech<\/title>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\n