Except the funds were never redistributed and now they never will be because they were put on hold pending the ruling of the Supreme Court, which has declared the system illegal.<\/p>\n
Sands and Parx sued the state shortly after the enactment of Act 42, alleging it was a violation of state and federal constitutions.<\/p>\n
Act 42 establishes a system specifically designed so that the taxpayers who pay the least into the CMDC Account are the most likely to receive a mandatory distribution from that account (and the less they pay, the more they receive), and vice versa,\u201d he wrote.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\u201cAny advantage that a high-earning casino which does not qualify for an automatic distribution might receive from the gaming industry being \u2018up and running\u2019 throughout Pennsylvania is too speculative to be considered a benefit proportional to the amount of money it must pay into the (Act 42) account,\u201d Saylor wrote.<\/p>\n
Revenue Department spokesman Jeffrey Johnson told the Allentown Morning Call<\/em> that his department was reviewing the decision. He said there was currently around $21 million in the fund although he could not provide a per-casino breakdown.<\/p>\nTax Headache <\/strong><\/h2>\nThis is not the first time a Pennsylvania casino tax program has been ruled unconstitutional by its Supreme Court.<\/p>\n
In 2016, the court shot down the state\u2019s \u201clocal share assessment\u201d system, which directed all casinos outside of Philadelphia to pay 2 percent or $10 million \u2013 whichever was greater \u2013 of slot revenue to local communities.<\/p>\n
On that occasion, it was the state\u2019s weaker-performing casino that took umbrage, arguing the tax rates were differential and discriminatory against smaller operators.<\/p>\n
The court ruled that they violated the uniformity clause of the US Constitution.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Pennsylvania\u2019s Supreme Court has ruled the state must return millions of dollars to its most successful casinos because they were required to contribute to a special fund that would benefit competitors while receiving nothing in return. The state\u2019s top court on Friday sided with its two best-performing casinos, Sands Bethlehem and Parx Casino, who argued […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":36,"featured_media":103810,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,18,13592],"tags":[],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
Pennsylvania Must Return Millions to Top Casinos, Per Supreme Court<\/title>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\n