Fairfax Casino Bill to Limit Development to Tysons Auto Dealership
Posted on: January 17, 2024, 04:29h.
Last updated on: January 18, 2024, 12:04h.
The Fairfax County casino effort spearheaded by Virginia Sen. David Marsden (D-Fairfax) has reportedly been amended to allow the gaming resort to be built at only one specific site.
Since last year, Marsden has been campaigning to designate Fairfax County in Northern Virginia as a permissible casino host jurisdiction. He’s working with Del. Wren Williams (R-Stuart) to rally bipartisan support for the undertaking.
Though Marsden hasn’t officially introduced the Fairfax casino legislation in Richmond, the longtime state lawmaker provided details on the forthcoming statute to NBC4 Washington this week. The biggest revelation in Marsden’s interview is that he will limit where the casino can operate.
“The eligible host locality … shall be limited to a proposed site for a casino gaming establishment that is located within one-quarter of a mile of an existing station on the Metro Silver Line, part of a coordinated mixed-use project development, outside of the Dulles airport flight path, within two miles of a major shopping destination containing not less than 1.5 million square feet of gross building area, and outside of the Interstate 495 Beltway.”
Marsden said that essentially boils the possible spots down to a former auto dealership along Route 7 in Tysons.
Dwindling Tax Base
Much of Fairfax County, specifically the census-designated Tysons, is home to abundant office space. Marsden and backers of his casino push say COVID-19 greatly reduced the county’s property tax benefit, as buildings have lost value because many workers now permanently perform their jobs remotely.
There’s a real need to try to figure out a way to help plug the property tax hole that’s going to happen,” said state Senator and Democratic Majority Leader Scott Surovell (D-Fairfax). “If we want good schools, the burden of offsetting lost tax revenue is going to fall on homeowners, so the county needs more revenue sources.”
Marsden says he’s seeking to give Fairfax voters a choice.
“I don’t want anybody to say 10 years from now, ‘Gee, why didn’t somebody anticipate the changes in our revenue picture here in Fairfax County and make adjustments?'” Marsden asked.
Long Odds
Many local governments and neighborhood and community associations in the Tysons region have come out in opposition to Marsden’s bill. The Vienna Town Council, Reston Citizens Association, and McClean Citizens Association have each voiced their antagonism to a casino resort.
Marsden says it isn’t just a casino, but an entertainment and business district with hotel and convention capabilities.
If Marsden’s bill received adequate support in the General Assembly and was signed by Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R), Fairfax voters would have the ultimate say on whether the county’s casino resort would be authorized. The county would hold a competitive bid to field pitches from interested developers, and then put the project before local voters through a ballot referendum.
A casino push to designate Petersburg is also ongoing. That legislative effort is now being led by state Sens. Louise Lucas (D-Portsmouth) and Lashrecse Aird (D-Petersburg).
Four casinos have already been approved via local referendums in Norfolk, Portsmouth, Danville, and Bristol. Rivers Casino Portsmouth was the first permanent casino to open a year ago this month. Temporary casinos have also opened in Danville and Bristol.
Related News Articles
Casino Supporters in Northern Virginia Form Political Action Committee
Vienna Town Council Opposes Fairfax Casino Through Legislative Agenda
Most Popular
Most Commented
Most Read
LOST VEGAS: First Documented ‘Trick Roll’ by a Prostitute
Last Comment ( 1 )
Legislators at every level ALWAYS focus on the added tax revenues from a casino and other initiatives. They never mention, much less consider, the extra costs that come with adding a casino to our county, financial and social, especially in the area around where it might be built. And, indirectly, they never consider how they might better control spending to reduce, if not eliminate, any shortfall in tax revenues. Their singular goal is to generate more tax revenues so they can spend more.